Pascal Photography Studio

Capturing the moment 1 frame at a time.

Some post-processing comparisons

I am by no means a post-processing master, I have only started to do post-processing in the last few months an found it more then necessary on most images I take, not that the photo is bad. Post-processing allows to add so much more vibrance to photos, some may call it cheating, I used to, I do not believe it anymore.

For example take this photo (all photos have been resized to 600×400 pixels):

No post-processing
No post-processing

High Pass Sharpening with Corel Paint Shop Pro Photo X2
High Pass Sharpened

Post-processed with Corel Paint Shop Pro Photo X2 all automatic, maybe a little too sharp
Post-Processed

Post-processed with Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 2.4 all automatic
Lightroom post-processing

Tone-mapped with High Dynamic Range in Photomatix Pro 3.2 using 3 photos.
Tone Mapped HDR

Exposure Fusion with Photomatix Pro 3.2 using 3 photos.
Exposure Fused

Personally the Exposure Fusion and Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 2 are my favourite, however for Exposure Fusion as for High Dynamic Range  it takes at least 2 identical photos at different exposure like HDR to achieve any results, that means using a tripod and ideally taking 3 to 7 photos at different exposure to get the best results and I will need to buy Photomatix Pro 3 as i am only running the trial at this time, see the watermarks?

I would also love to use Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 2 but the premium is preventing me right now, the demo is great though, I love it.

I still have so much to learn from post-processing, next thing you know I’ll be using Photoshop ;-)

VN:F [1.9.7_1111]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.7_1111]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Add a comment